logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2021.03.25 2019고단3355
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The defendant shall pay 349,515,143 won to the applicant by fraud.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) brought in the sedi language purchased in China into the Republic of Korea and sold online, which became aware of the victim B who operated the sedi language sales store; (b) was not capable of concluding a Korean total sales contract with the victim under the name of the victim E; and (c) did not have the intent or ability to return the sedi language in the event that the victim would normally supply or could not supply the sedi language even if he received the payment from the injured party; (b) did not have the intent or ability to return the sedi language; and (c) if the victim would be able to supply the sedi language without fail, if the victim would be able to be the Korean total market; and (d) if the victim pays the sedi language, he would have the sedi language to order the victim without the intent to purchase it, or actually remains in the Republic of Korea and received the purchase of the sedi language in mobile Me to contact the victim with the victim by receiving a large amount of orders from the damaged party and received part of the money under the name of the victim.

From February 27, 2018, the Defendant visited the victim B at a place where it is difficult to know the exact location from around February 27, 2018, and sought to easily find out that “The Defendant has a relationship with the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff as a member of the study in China related to F, G, etc., in the Chinese Republic of Korea.” Furthermore, the Defendant may enter into a domestic total sales contract.

If a promise, etc. is paid to the recipient who needs to be confirmed, it will be supplied at the time of payment.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the above facts did not have the intent or ability to properly supply the rule, even if the victim has harmed the victim's total domestic market or received the payment from the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above.

arrow