beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendants’ joint crimes committed by the Defendants are the operators of (ju) F (Closure business closure on May 25, 2015) (the closure of business operation on May 25, 2015) who are agents of E (hereinafter referred to as “E”) that are companies manufacturing semiconductor machinery and parts, and Defendant B is the head of the E’s service team (the retirement officer in March 2015).
Defendant
A In the middle of October 2014, Defendant B, “A is planned to provide services in China, and if sales of each part, service will continue, so he would be imprising fine in the future. It will be able to prepare five parts of E equipment for 40% of the selling price.
The defendant B asked "," and the defendant B asked that "it is possible to obtain the approval of the representative director or to deduct parts from the price, once the first supply is sent back to the deducted parts, and it is not possible to continue to meet the price, so it is reasonable to produce them after obtaining the approval of the representative director since the second supply does not meet the price." The parts stored in the E warehouse are to be exported to China.
Defendant
A around November 10, 2014, through G, a broker, L, and the victim H (H and Taiwan nationality) installed at least 1,000 parts of the E-Fow equipment in China, and the E-W service agency can sell parts corresponding to the five parts of the E-month equipment and make profits from 15 to 30% while providing services to the Korean companies in China using the equipment if the E-W service agency is equipped with at least 1,000 parts, so it would be possible for the victim to become the E-W service agency and would be able to supply the normal parts.
However, in fact, Defendant A was planned to send the victim's parts to the victim's warehouse, and Defendant A was unable to provide services to Korean companies in China if the normal parts of E were not normal parts, regardless of E, and even if the victim received money from the victim, Defendant A did not have an intention or ability to become an agency of China.
Defendant
A shall belong to the injured party on November 2014.