Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are the operators of the “E Game Center” on the second floor of the Jeju-si D Building.

A game products-related business entity shall not allow any gambling or other speculative act using game water, or leave the game products alone to do so.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired with each other from March 3, 2016 to the same year.

7. From the end of December 26, 200, by installing a game machine of 50 games for “new posters losses” in the above game and 20 games for “the 20 game machine for “the 20 game prior to west”, and having customers pay points directly by inserting money in the game machine, then dividing the press unit, and allowing customers to play the game by acquiring certain points according to the picture and number of the card card in five pages, and then allowing customers to sell and sell the above free right of use by issuing a copy of 10,000 won free right of use for each game.

Accordingly, the Defendants prevented the Defendants from engaging in gambling and other speculative acts using game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. An explanatory note;

1. A photograph of a dynamic image closure;

1. Each investigation report (reporter, information and game products);

1. Free voucher photographs;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of the statutes governing Defendant’s text messages

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 44(1)1 and Article 28 of the Act on the Promotion of respective Game Industry; Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A: Determination on the Defendants’ assertion under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants asserted that the act of trading a free voucher to customers is illegal by actively and continuously informing customers of the fact that it is illegal, and thus, the Defendants engaged in the best efforts to prevent free use voucher trading among customers, and thus, prevented them from engaging in a speculative act or getting them to do so.

shall not be deemed to exist.

2. The reasoning of the judgment reveals the following.