1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Plaintiff C and J corresponding to the amount of additional payment order.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows 2. On the other hand, the plaintiff CJ died on November 8, 2013 while the lawsuit in this case is in progress, and on the other hand, the plaintiff CJ jointly inherited the plaintiff CJ's property with each of 1/5 shares of the plaintiff ML, MM, MN, MN, MP, each of 1/5 shares during the lawsuit in this case." The 8th part of the 4th part of the 8th part "DW was married with the plaintiff MW, and had the plaintiff LX, LY, LZ, LZ, MA, MB, and MB." The 9th part of the 10th part of the 9th part "On the other hand, the plaintiff GM died on the other hand on October 24, 2012, and the plaintiff MN's spouse's MPM 3/45 NH/4 of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 7th part judgment.

2. Parts 4, Nos. 12 to 14, 12, 12, 14 of the 8th part used " " 8) AY had been residing in the YY and operated a field of camping. On October 6, 1949, a police officer belonging to the Nanyang Police Station was towed on the same military base as he was killed in the gymology, the gymology, the village mountain, and the family was recovered thereafter." The portion of the 8th part "Ma GG (the death of December 21, 1975)" is "Ma GG (the death of December 21, 1975)", and the portion of "IL (the 5th day of September 5, 1965)" in the last 9th part "No. 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance is added to "No. 10, 195," and "No. 30, 1965," and "No. 1000.

A. The plaintiffs' assertion.