1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary part] Part 9 of Part II, “Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) was established for the purpose of military supply business, etc. on November 13, 1985, and changed its trade name to Defendant AV (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) on August 13, 2014.”

1. Each of the Defendant Company shall be added to “Defendant Company”, respectively, for the second 16, 17th 17th 8, 16, 17th 8, 14th 1, 11, 15, 16, 18th 3, 19, 19th 3, 5, 5, 8, 10th 6, 16, 17th 17, 5, 11, 13, 14, 19th 10, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19th 2, 6, 8, 12th 6, 14

In light of the fact-finding 8-10 of the 8th page, “The above-mentioned facts are insufficient to acknowledge that Defendant C prepared the above e-mail and statement by stealing the Plaintiff’s name on his own or through another person, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.” Meanwhile, the Plaintiff submitted the above e-mail statement (Evidence 2-1, 2-2 of the above e-mail) while filing the instant lawsuit, and the Plaintiff also sent the supplementary statement (Evidence 4-28, 29, 30 of the above e-mail), other than the above e-mail, to the public prosecutor who has investigated the relevant criminal case. In light of the above, it is insufficient to acknowledge that Defendant C prepared the above e-mail and statement by abusing the Plaintiff’s name on his own or through another person, and there is no other evidence to recognize it.”

every 1th day to 6th day of the 11st day “B”.