1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment except for the following parts.

(Other, the grounds alleged by the plaintiffs in this court are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiffs in the first instance court, and even if all the allegations and the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs are examined, the decision of this case and the judgment of the first instance court that did not recognize the eligibility of the plaintiffs to seek the revocation of the decision of this case is justifiable). [The part that was modified] Article 20 of the first instance judgment 5 of the first instance judgment "Article 2 subparagraph 3 (d)" in Article 2 subparagraph 4 of the first instance judgment "Article 26 (1)" in Article 26 (1) 8 of the first instance judgment "Article 26 (1)" in Article 26 (2) 8 of the first instance judgment "Article 132"

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' lawsuit of this case is dismissed in entirety as it is unlawful, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.