logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.01 2017가합31715
정정보도 및 손해배상청구
Text

1. The plaintiffs' respective claims against the defendants are dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant H is a terrestrial broadcasting company that broadcast “L” and at the time of February 14, 2017, Defendant I was the chief of Defendant H’s news report headquarters, Defendant J was the chief of Defendant H’s news report headquarters, and Defendant J was the chief of Defendant H’s news report headquarters.

Plaintiff

A Organization A (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s trade union”) is a trade union organized by Defendant H workers, and the rest of the Plaintiffs are the same year from January 30, 2012 under the lead of the Plaintiff’s trade union.

7. The persons dismissed by Defendant H after the strike made up of 17th (hereinafter “instant strike”)

B. On February 14, 2017, Defendant H reported each article listed in the [Attachment 2] List through K’s “K” program (hereinafter “instant report”), and its main contents are as follows.

[S] The summary of the report of Nos. 1 and 1 N parties related to the instant strike are under pressure to Defendant H through a hearing, etc. in cooperation with the Plaintiff Trade Union.

At the time of the past 2012 total line and the fleet A organization being towed for 170 days and found the field of the H illegal strike. At the time of the strike, the nights were able to engage in the political strike of the Trade Union while indicating active support.

In front of the presidential line of this year, N.N. will take back the problem of the union staff dismissed as an illegal strike at the time and put the same into H pressure.

2 ON political parties are trying to play a role in public broadcasting by proposing a bill related to the media claimed by the Plaintiff trade union.

It also includes the contents that the National Treasury should support A's union members, etc. dismissed as "illegal political strike" as "persons of distinguished service to the State" and should recognize the increase in salary for the period of dismissal.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap 8-2, and 8-3, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. The plaintiffs' assertion was legitimate, but the defendants have undermined the honor of the plaintiffs by publicly alleging the false facts that "the strike of this case is illegal" through the report of this case.

Therefore, it is therefore.

arrow