The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s punishment (two million won of fine) against the Defendant on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment defendant is going against and against the time to commit the instant crime, and is going against the will not further repeat the crime.

On the other hand, the defendant, along with his accomplices in 2016, provided the commercial sex acts and the commercial sex acts of arranging commercial sex acts, and provided information on the condition of commercial sex acts and provided the place of promise to the sexual purchasing who calls for their distribution, and provided such information to them. On the other hand, the defendant has been sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months for imprisonment with labor for the crimes of violating the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. and the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Commercial Sex Acts.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, environment, health conditions, the background of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.