logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2012.01.19 2011고정4228
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2009, the Defendant agreed to make a false entry into public electronic records, etc., and the Defendant agreed to make a false entry into public electronic records, etc., with the intention of KRW 4 million from Vietnam at the time of harming a disguised marriage with Vietnam.

On December 31 of the same year, the Defendant: (a) filed a false marriage report with a public official in charge of family relation registration who pretended to have been married with Vietnam, despite the absence of an intention to establish a genuine marital relationship with the Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul; and (b) had the said public official enter the said L into and register the marriage with the Defendant in the family relation electronic data processing system, which is a public electronic record book; and (c) had the said public official store and operate the family relation electronic data processing system, which includes false facts, as seen above.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with K, L, etc. to make a false report to the public official by making a false report to enter false facts in the public electronic data processing system for family relations, which is a public electronic record, and exercised it by storing and operating it at a place around that time.

2. The Defendant violated the Immigration Control Act: (a) prepared necessary documents to apply for a visa, such as a letter of self-introduction, which entered the date and time stated in the preceding paragraph into the Republic of Korea, while having been employed; and (b) delivered the document to L through Broman M.

Accordingly, the Defendant, around February 1, 2010, violated the Immigration Control Act by allowing L to apply for a visa for a false spouse (F-2) at the Embassy of the Republic of Korea in Vietnam.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant or K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (attached to documents to be attached to A marriage of a suspect), investigation reports (verification of a person who has bought a suspect's K price transfer, hand-on transfer);

1. Article 228 of the Criminal Act and Article 228 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts;

arrow