beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. False entry, false entry, and electromagnetic records;
A. On November 12, 2004, the Defendant: (a) entered and staying in the Republic of Korea by means of disguised marriage with Korea under the name of “D”; (b) was found to have difficulty in staying in the Republic of Korea under the above name; (c) was aware of the fact; (d) was willing to make a disguised marriage again in another name; (c) was introduced from “F” on November 2007, by introducing G (the claim for a summary order on the same day) from “F,” and offered a proposal to offer KRW 5 million at the time of a disguised marriage to G; and (d) G consented thereto.
Around January 15, 2008, the Defendant reported the marriage with G in the name of “A” at Bangladesh, and around February 4, 2008, at the public service center of the Eup/Myeon office of the former North Korea on or around February 4, 2008, the Defendant: (a) prepared a marriage report through G as if the Defendant and G were married with the true will; and (b) filed a false marriage report by submitting it to a public official in charge of family relationship registration who is not aware of the fact; (c) had the Defendant enter, store, and register the same in the public electronic data processing system, which is a public electronic record, by having the Defendant enter, store, and operate the said system with which the fact of insolvency was recorded.
B. On January 14, 2009, the Defendant committing a crime involving children: (a) at the lower-nam Viewing civil service center, the Defendant drafted a birth report as if the I, who is a child between H and the actual husband, was a child between G and submitted it to the public official in charge of family relationship registration who may know of the fact thereof; (b) had I enter and store I as a child between the Defendant and G in the family relationship electronic data processing system, which is a public electronic record, and had the said public official operate the said system with which the facts of the illegality were recorded as above.