logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.03.20 2014나24114
손해배상 등
Text

1. The deletion of articles and indirect compulsory enforcement of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows:

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except in cases where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is rewritten or added as stated in the following 2. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the 4th page 13 of the judgment of the first instance, the part which re-written or added the judgment of the first instance shall be added to the following: “The voice “wem” and “wem” shall be confirmed to have been satisfed and damaged by the important part at a 5cm level.”

After the 6th page 8 of the first instance court ruling, the term “videos” is added to the voice “I clearly indicate that I created an artificial port to E in order to prevent infections in the upper part at the time of the first operation and will perform restoration operations after the fifth month.”

On the seventh 8th of the judgment of the first instance court, the phrase “the photograph” and the phrase “the details” shall be added to the following.

At the bottom of the 12th judgment of the first instance court, the phrase “I am fl,” and the phrase “I am fl and fl and fl and fl and fl and fl and fl and fl and so it seems contrary, are re-written.”

Part 14 of the decision of the first instance court shall add "1......................... ......................

Article 17 of the judgment of the first instance court "(15)" is added to the contents of the Plaintiff E's injury in the news Nos. 1 and 6 of the instant case, and the contents of the Plaintiff E's injury in the news Nos. 1 and 6 of the instant case, "the fact that the ledger has been tight and important, damaged the volume of 5 cm, difficult to perform a normal speaking, and is excessively and specifically disclosed."

Each “shot” shall be taken from the bottom to the end of the 18th sentence of the first instance court in the form of “shot and detailed”, respectively.

No. 20 of the first instance court's decision "4. 6. 7 Plaintiff E's s. s. s. s. s. 6. 7's s. 1. 4. 6.7's s. s. 99 and s. 20."

arrow