logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.16 2018나16811
사해행위취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain in this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 7 of the 8th judgment of the first instance court "each entry in Eul evidence 1 to 4" is "each entry in Eul evidence 1 to 4, 7 through 10, the new bank of the first instance court, and the results of each order to submit financial transaction information to KB National Bank".

After the 7th decision of the first instance court, “The lease deposit of this case was paid by E, the Defendant’s wife, with the money received from the Marshbook loan, and later, it appears that E would be paid with the above money by returning KRW 100,000,000 from the lessor of the F apartment, the previous residence, and the said money would have been repaid.”

The 7th of the first instance court's 7th of the 7th court's ruling "Nami" shall be changed to "low".

The 8th sentence of the first instance court's 8th sentence " is correct, and it is not enough to reverse the above recognition only in the circumstances alleged by the plaintiff."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow