Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 45,927,209 and KRW 5% per annum from May 28, 2013 to September 8, 2015 and the next day.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff, around May 17, 2012, owns C Limited Company (hereinafter “C”) and D (hereinafter “D”), etc. (hereinafter “instant building”), an insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with G (hereinafter “management company”) that is the management company of the building F in Geumcheon-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant building”) on the ground of land (hereinafter “instant building”) outside Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”); the content of guarantee; the comprehensive property risk security (S Section I, Dotyllisk) and the liability risk security (S IV, General Li): the insurance period: from May 18, 2012 to May 18, 2013: the management company and owner of the instant building (However, the management company is limited to the management company and the owner of the instant building).
B. On July 4, 2012, the Defendant leased the instant Nos. H and I from C during the lease period from August 4, 2012 to July 31, 2014, with a deposit of KRW 48 million, monthly rent of KRW 4.8 million (Additional tax separate), and the lease period from August 1, 2012 to July 31, 2014.
C. On March 29, 2013, around 12:52, a fire (hereinafter “instant fire”) occurred in the part where the air conditioners, air conditioners, etc., installed in the bend of the instant building I (hereinafter “the instant air conditioners”), were accumulated by a fire (hereinafter “instant fire”).
Due to the fire of this case, the aggregate weather and the wall surface of the government, etc. in the bend of the building I were destroyed, and the heat of the building of this case owned by D was damaged by the outdoor exit room, etc. of the building of this case owned by D and D, and the repair cost of this case occurred in total of KRW 64,580,879. Meanwhile, due to the fire of this case, the lessee Q and R entered the fire of this case, and the medical cost of this case was KRW 1,027,350 (= Q91,850 KRW 115,50). D.
On the other hand, immediately after the fire in this case, the fire investigator presumed the fire to be “the fire was caused by the electrical joint line from the outdoor machine of this case.”