The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not err by misapprehending the facts and thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the court below consistently stated that “E, who was well-known by the defendant from the Moel operated by the defendant to the investigation agency and the court of the court below, entered the Moel with F, and at the time, the defendant did not have any particular confirmation, such as asking the age of F, etc.” (see, e.g., evidence records 9 pages, trial records 49,50 pages), and there are no special circumstances to suspect the credibility of the statement, and the “F’s statement” or G’s legal statement, which is a police officer, also conforms to the above statement. Thus, the court below’s finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.