logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.06.28 2017고정1821
청소년보호법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. No person prosecuted shall conduct business activities having juveniles lodge together with men and women, or provide a place for such business activities;

On January 30, 2017, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, received accommodation expenses of 40,000 won from D (16:00,000) from D (16:0,00,000 from the Defendant’s employees at the Hanwon Hawon-gun, Kuwon-gun, the Defendant’s employees, in relation to the Defendant’s business, and engaged in the act of mixing D and E (13 years of age) with the Defendant’s employees at the above her her ir

2. Determination

A. The facts charged in the instant case are that the Defendant’s employee B, a juvenile, was able to congested with D and E at the motherel operated by the Defendant, and the prosecutor was indicted by applying both punishment provisions.

In this regard, the defendant did not conduct his business in a manner that she or her husband B did not allow the juvenile to have sexual intercourse, and did not recognize the juvenile's divorce on the day of the instant case.

The argument is asserted.

B. There are statements of D and E as evidence of the facts charged in the instant case.

① On May 14, 2017, D was investigated as the recipient of the case in violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (e.g., deceptive scheme) against E on May 14, 2017.

In the case of selling, E makes a statement to the effect that “I see I see I see I see I see I see,” and on June 21, 2017, E made a statement from the prosecution as a witness for the instant case, and “I see that E was a mobile phone when calculating the telecom.”

Mael State stated that he did not ask her age to Na.

② On May 9, 2017, E made a statement at the investigative agency on May 9, 201 to the victim of the above child’s violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (e.g., deceptive scheme) to the effect that “E was put with arms in the past with the execution of the DNA expenses,” and in this court, “When entering the telecom, D entered the telecom.”

“As the horses were the horses.”

arrow