The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts: The Defendant did not lick the victim’s breath and salke the victim’s breath, thereby damaging the victim’s bottom.

B. Unreasonable sentencing: The sentence of the lower judgment (the fine of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. The following circumstances are revealed by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts: ① the victim made a consistent statement from the investigative agency to the court below to the effect that “the defendant was satisfing over the asphalt floor and satisfing up to the clothes”; ② According to the victim’s right-hand shoulder photo, the upper part of the victim’s right-hand shoulder was flafed in the same direction, and rather than the victim’s flaf, rather than the victim’s flaf, it appears that the victim was flafed over and divided into the victim’s flaf, such as the victim’s statement, and ③ the victim was flafed beyond the victim’s flafed, and the victim was found guilty of the victim’s flaf in light of the victim’s oral statement of E (the victim’s flaf and the victim’s flafed over the upper part of the charges).”

Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is rejected.

3. There are circumstances to consider the background of the instant case’s allegation of unfair sentencing, and the degree of injury to the victim is not much important, but the victim still remains against the defendant because the defendant did not agree with the victim.