The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

The defendant above.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1 did not contain any misunderstanding of facts against the victims. Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts charged against the Defendant. 2) The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant of unfair sentencing (two years of imprisonment with prison labor for six months) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s determination of mistake of facts and evidence duly adopted and examined by the trial court and the trial court, namely, ① each statement at A’s investigation agency and the trial court were different in detail. However, as to the situation at the time when the Defendant was tightly and consistently stated that “the lower court and the Defendant were able to wear clothes and tightly and pushed down the Defendant. Although the Defendant was at low time, the lower court’s statement was relatively consistent with the purport that “The Defendant was sweet down, and the Defendant was sweet up to two floors by hand,” ② each statement at the lower court’s investigation agency and the trial court and the victims appeared to have a little difference in detailed parts. However, the victims appeared to have been 6k and sweeted with the Defendant and the Defendant were sweet up to 1 and sweet up to 6 minutes in the process of the Defendant’s statement to the effect that “The Defendant was sweet up to 6 minutes in a relatively consistent manner.”