Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) on March 22, 2014, the Defendant 17:20 on the street in front of the Ethys of the Jingu, Jingu, Jingu, Jingu, Jingu, Jin-si, the Defendant 2: (b) f working with the victim C, and C, at a place where C was drinking alcohol; (c) seated, seated, flad, flad, flad, flad, and flad, and flad, flad, and flad, and flad, and flad,
On the other hand, the son, the drunk victim, and the son and the son under the influence of alcohol are about twice the son of the defendant, and the son and the son are also pushing with the victim with breabbling, and the victim is also pushing with the breath like the flab.
The victim suffered from the injury of the two thrings of the treatment days to the victim, the thrings of the non-freshional brain, the thrings of the strings, the blood species of the strings, and the strings of the
2. Determination
A. The Defendant, as described in the facts charged, was punished between C and C. However, the Defendant was pushing ahead with C’s breath and was pushed down with C.
C asserts that it is not to go beyond the floor of smuggling, but to go beyond the back tamper of C.
B. The establishment of facts constituting an offense in a criminal trial ought to be based on strict evidence with probative value, which makes a judge not to have any reasonable doubt, and thus, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof does not sufficiently reach the extent that such conviction would lead to such a conviction, the court should make a decision on the benefit of the defendant even if there is suspicion of guilt, such as the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable.
C. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the Defendant was spawn and was pushed down with C’s ebbbage.
It is difficult to see that it has been proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that C was tightly above the floor.
(1) G is from investigative agencies and from F in this court.