The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) determined that the crime of injury was established as shown in the facts charged, even though the Defendant was found to have committed assault, such as kneeing the victim’s flag, kneeing the victim’s flag, etc., even though the Defendant did not inflict an injury upon the victim for about 10 weeks of medical treatment. The judgment of the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below and the court below, namely, ① the victim D has consistently made a statement that corresponds to the facts charged as a whole in relation to the situation in which the victim was injured on the left side of the present case from the investigation stage to the court of the court below, ② the police officer called the witness F at the time of the present case: “The defendant was pushed the victim on a vehicle parked with the victim and assaulted the victim on the left side of the victim on one occasion. (The 7th page of the investigation record).” This is deemed to have high credibility as the witness's statement immediately after the case was committed by the defendant; ③ another witness and I made a statement that corresponds to the defendant's assertion, but it is difficult to view the credibility of the victim and the victim's statement solely on the ground that the witness himself did not voluntarily witness the procedure of dispute between the defendant and the victim in the present case and the court of the court below, and ④ the fact that the defendant used the victim's testimony during the inquiry of the victim's injury to the victim.