1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a legal entity that operates the Gllangbuk University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. C, from November 2010 to December 2010, at D Hospital, a specialized hospital for brain cerebrovascular in Daegu-gu, received treatment due to severe cerebral cerebral chroscopsis and both sides of it, while continuously taking back the styphropic stypha and chropiacquerel (hereinafter referred to as “hyropic hyropic hyroid system”).

C On November 4, 2014, the Defendant hospital visited the department within the fire extinguisher for the purpose of being subject to the eroscopic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic dic sc). At that time, the Defendant hospital explained explained explained explained explained explained.

On January 29, 2015, the Defendant hospital conducted the above procedure to C, which was two months after the date, and after the organizational inspection, it confirmed that the above procedure had been affected by the scam to the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the scam of the sc

The Defendant Hospital, on February 11, 2015, is a prior test on blood coamic disease to C and related tests. In particular, it is a test to select which is both or functionally problematic among the blood softeners. The Defendant Hospital conducted the test on which the blood softeners and coauters. Among these tests, the number of the blood softeners, profrobopsis (PT), partial profining of profrobopsis (Activ, APT);