1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 8,000,000 to Plaintiff A, as well as 5% per annum from November 19, 2013 to July 16, 2015, respectively.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 8, 2006, Plaintiff A was conducted with D Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and both sides of the Plaintiff A’s knee-free knee-free knee-free kne-free kne-free kne-free

B. From around 2003, Plaintiff A was diagnosed with brain cerebral typosis around September 2005, and thus, Plaintiff A was taking advantage of the psychotropic typosis after being given a prescription of Amathroids, genetic typoids, typoids, typers, etc. from Defendant hospital in order to prevent cerebral typ recurrence recurrence, and was ordered to completely suspend the administration of the above drugs in order to prevent knee-hne-hump tye-hump tye-hume tye-hume tye-hume tye-hume tye-hume tye-hume tye-hume tye-hume tye-hum

C. On March 10, 2006, Plaintiff A had been suffering from cerebral typosis due to the recurrence of cerebral typosis, and Plaintiff A was subject to class III diagnosis on cerebral typosis.

Plaintiff

B is the spouse of the plaintiff A.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Liability for damages caused by default;

A. (1) The medical staff of the Defendant hospital in charge of nonperformance due to the negligence on the part of the Plaintiff’s medical guidance is obligated to treat the patient with the care of a good manager in accordance with the contract on the delegation of medical treatment with the patient and to give necessary treatment as a doctor with the best care to prevent the patient’s health condition from aggravation in the process.

In full view of the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 4, Eul evidence Nos. 3, and the whole purport of the arguments in the medical record appraisal report with respect to the president of the Korean Medical Association of this Court, in order to prevent cerebral typhism recurrence due to the disease suffering from cerebral typhrosis, the plaintiff A was used for clothes after being prescribed by the defendant hospital with nephism, emull, emull, and typhroids, and the above drugs for which the plaintiff A her uniforms included an antiquation. This is during the operation.