1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 3, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with D on the land of 30,093 square meters of C forest land (hereinafter “instant forest”) in Si/Gu, and completed the registration of ownership transfer concerning the instant forest land on July 23, 2015.

나. 이 사건 임야에는 별지 도면 표시 21, 22, 23, 24, 21의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈓ 부분 20㎡ 위에 분묘 1기가, 같은 도면 표시 25, 26, 27, 28, 25의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈔ 부분 20㎡ 위에 분묘 1기가, 같은 도면 표시 29, 30, 31, 32, 29의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈕ 부분 20㎡ 위에 분묘 1기(이하 위 분묘 3기를 합하여 ‘이 사건 각 분묘’라고 한다)가 설치되어 있는데, 위 ㈓ 부분 분묘는 피고의 증조부인 망 E(1936. 10. 18.경 사망)의, 위 ㈔ 부분 분묘는 피고의 조부인 망 F(1929. 4. 6.경 사망), 위 ㈕ 부분의 분묘는 피고의 부 망 G(1988. 6. 29.경 사망)의 분묘로 피고가 제사를 주재하며 관리하여 왔다.

[Grounds for Recognition: Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, Evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, and 7, and the purport of the whole video and pleading No. 3]

2. Determination on requests for graves mining and land transfer

A. According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant, who has the right to manage and dispose of each of the instant graves as the presiding official of the company, is obligated to excavate each of the instant graves to the Plaintiff, the owner of the instant forest land, and deliver the relevant land.

B. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant acquired by prescription the right to grave base on each of the instant graves.

In other words, the following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the above basic facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, and the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 3, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, and Eul evidence Nos. 3, i.e., the forest of this case where each of the instant graves was installed, Eul's son, the defendant's high tide, made registration of preservation of ownership around April 1, 1926.