logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013.09.27 2013도5999
업무상횡령등
Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Reasons

1. First, Defendant A and C’s grounds of appeal (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed) are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below was just in finding the above Defendants guilty of the facts charged for the reasons stated in its holding, and there was no violation of law of logic and experience and free evaluation of evidence against the law of logic and experience.

2. Next, Defendant B’s appeal is examined.

Defendant

B did not submit a statement of grounds for appeal within the statutory period, and the petition of appeal does not contain any indication in the grounds for appeal.

(The appellate brief filed by Defendant B was received on June 25, 2013, the later time limit and the later time limit) Therefore, with respect to Defendant B, the final appeal shall be dismissed by a ruling in accordance with Article 380 of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, the final appeal shall be dismissed by a judgment en bloc with Defendant A and C’s final appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow