logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.19 2017고합518
통화위조등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed with the intent to use 10,000 won in the Bank of Korea notes, while showing a video image that created forged papering by accessing the Internet’s website.

On March 3, 2017, the Defendants connected Defendant A’s accommodation, H, 221, and Defendant A’s Internet “Gugle” to his own Nowon-do computers, followed by downloading KRW 10,00,00 in front and back pages of the Bank of Korea notes, and printed out the back page to A4 by editing them into the same site, and then in front, back and back of the copy of the copies of the original paper as seen above, and forged Chapter 4 of the Bank of Korea notes by attaching them as an industrial exploitation.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge the abolition of the Republic of Korea used for the purpose of exercising the rights.

2. On March 9, 2017, at around 00:33, the Defendant: (a) taken a taxi on the taxi platform operated by JJ, Inc., a company operating by I from the taxi platform of an apartment apartment that is located in Gandong-gun, Gandong-gun, Gandong-gun, and (b) exercised this by delivering 10,000 won of the forged Bank of Korea Notes to the said I, as if the 10,000 won of the forged Bank of Korea Notes was duly formed.

3. On March 10, 2017, around 17:40, the Defendant: (a) boarded a U.S. military unit’s access to the taxi in front of his/her dwelling; (b) went on the taxi operated by the U.S. military unit M; and (c) used the forged 10,000 won forged 10,000 won, as genuine, on the road front of the restaurant located in Young-gu, the purpose of which was to be used; and (d) exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made against I and M;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of respective seizure;

1. Requests for appraisal and replies;

1. As to the addition of the investigation report (as to the addition of the seized article’s “faciting and breaking”).

arrow