Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. "2017 Highest 6,100";
A. On September 9, 2017, the Defendant 21:04, on the street in front of the Youngcheon-si bus terminal located in Yongcheon-si, Youngcheon-ro, 44, the Defendant: (a) went on a cab operated by the victim B; and (b) appears to have been 40,000 won even if using the said cab, even in the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price, and (c) was operated by the victim up to the 40,000 won until the Posi-si, Gyeongcheon-gu, Yongcheon-gu, Seoul, the police station in charge with the Defendant.
Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as above; (b) had the victim operate a taxi; and (c) did not pay the operating fee; and (d) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 3,100.
B. On September 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was boarding a F taxi operated by the victim E on the street in front of the region south-gu at the port; and (b) did not have the intent or ability to pay the said taxi even if using the said taxi, and (c) went up to the front of the bus terminal in Yongcheon-si, Youngcheon-si, Seoul, Gyeongcheon-si, which is located on the right side of the Sincheon-si.
Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) had the victim operate a taxi; and (c) did not pay the operating fee; and (d) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 50,000.
2. On October 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) taken a H taxi operated by the injured party G in the vicinity of the Roi-gu, Northern-si, Matacheon-si on October 28, 2017; (b) went on and moved the said taxi before the third-distance in the Simsan-si, Yongcheon-si, in light of the fact that the Defendant would normally pay the taxi fee despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee in a normal manner. (c) On the same day, the Defendant called “Yacheon-do,” stating that he would normally pay the taxi fee.
Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) had the victim operate a taxi; and (c) did not pay the operating fee; and (d) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 50,000.
b)a summary of the evidence;