beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 10:17, the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Hospital; (b) around the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Hospital C Hospital; and (c) around the victim D’s E-si operated by the victim D, the Defendant stated that the Defendant was working as if the victim would pay the taxi fee normally; and (d) that the Defendant was changed to the F Hospital located in the Suwon-gu Line of Suwon-si.
However, even if the defendant uses a taxi, he/she did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi fee normally.
The Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as above; (b) had the victim operate the taxi to F Hospital located in Suwon-si G in Suwon-si; and (c) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 50,780 of the taxi fee.
2. “The Defendant, around December 30, 2016, at the vicinity of the street station in Seongbuk-gu Seoul on December 30, 2016, 201: (a) around December 30, 2016, he/she takes a cab operated by the victim H and act as if he/she would normally pay a taxi fee, and (b) the victim would go to the Red Cross Hospital in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
It was discussed.
However, even if the defendant uses a taxi, he/she did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi fee normally.
As seen above, Defendant deceiving the victim and caused the victim to operate a taxi to the Red Cross Hospital, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to 19,680 won of taxi fee.
3. On December 29, 2016, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 1968,” was on board a taxi operated by the victim while working as if he would pay the taxi charges at the front taxi stops located in the Dong-gu, Ulsan-gu, Busan-gu, Seoul-do, Seoul-si around December 29, 2016.
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay taxi charges even if he was provided with taxi operation from the injured party because there was no money in the water.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is provided with approximately 40 km taxi operation to the front road of the Gun in Gwangjin-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City. The defendant also pays KRW 36,540,00.