logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.09.26 2019고단3114
공공단체등위탁선거에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B, the second time on March 13, 2019, which was implemented on March 13, 2019, was released as a candidate for the election of the head of the Busan Metropolitan City C&C related to the election of the head of the Dong-dong Busan Metropolitan City, but was a successful candidate, and the defendant A was a long period of time between the defendant B and his local public official in the past

No one shall conduct an election campaign in any way except where a candidate for the head of a cooperative conducts an election campaign pursuant to the Act on Elections Commissioned by Public Organizations, Etc., in an election for the head of a cooperative managed by an election commission.

Nevertheless, around 10:00 on March 2, 2019, Defendant B received a proposal from Defendant A to attempt to carry out an election campaign by means of telephone conversations with Defendant B, on behalf of Defendant A, at the vecscscison subway station near the vecscison subway station located in Busan Shipping Daegu, but, at the same time, Defendant A received a proposal from Defendant A to help Defendant B carry out an election campaign by means of telephone conversations with Defendant B. On February 28, 2019, Defendant A opened one cell phone (D) which was opened for the election of the head of the said association.

Accordingly, at around 11:13 on March 7, 2019, Defendant A made a telephone conversation on election campaign between around 11:27, 2019 and around 14:42, in the same way, Defendant A made a telephone conversation on 838 occasions in total by the same way between 838 times from around 13:27, 2019 to March 7, 2019, by using the above cell phone to the members G using the above cell phone.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to carry out an election campaign by a person other than the president of the partnership.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A letter of confirmation (Evidence Nos. 5) and a monetary detailed statement;

arrow