Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 High 525] The Defendant posted a letter stating that he sells a game machine in the NAV, despite the absence of the capacity or intent to sell the NAP 4 SP games, regardless of the absence of the capacity or intent to sell it.

On December 1, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement that the Defendant would send a game machine by using convenience stores until December 5, 2016, when the Defendant first deposited the price for the game machine to the victim C, which was believed to be true and to purchase the game machine.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim C and receiving KRW 250,00 from the said victim’s own account (D) to receive KRW 250,00 from the said victim as the price for the game machine in its name, and received a total of KRW 1,135,00 from the victims as shown in the annexed Crime List.

[2017 High 526]

1. On November 16, 2016, at around 10:30, the Defendant: (a) used the gaps in which the surveillance of the Homeplers E was neglected; and (b) used one of the electric pressures of the Victim Homeplers equivalent to KRW 551,250, and stolen the two.

2. On November 28, 2016, at the same place as Paragraph 1, around 21:30 on November 28, 2016, the Defendant cited two (2) electric Pressures of the Victim Home Packers, which amount to KRW 1,102,50, and stolen them.

3. On November 29, 2016, at the same place as Paragraph 1, around November 29, 2016, the Defendant cited 551,250 won of the victim home pluger’s electrical pressure, and stolen them.

The Defendant of the 2017 High 527, the Defendant sold a gals glag to the Gain of the Republic of Korea on October 2016.

A notice to the effect that “the price is sent” was posted, and on October 29, 2016, the victim F who reported and contacted the above writing was “the price.”

It is intended to deliver the face-to-face pen tool.

“False speech” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a face-to-face tool, so even if he received the price, he did not have an intention or ability to transfer the above face-to-face tool to the victim F.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.