logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.05.14 2014고단425
출입국관리법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who operates C in Ansan-si, a member B.

No person shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

On March 9, 2013, the Defendant employed 30 foreigners who did not have the status of stay that could engage in job-seeking activities, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form C, from that time to October 8, 2013, including employment of China, who entered the status of stay for short-term visits (C3) in the above Section C as a short-term visit (C3).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Accusation of an immigration offender;

1. Each notice of decision on examining an immigration offender;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each statement of employment;

1. Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act, the choice of applicable laws and punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of sentencing)

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. is a case where the defendant unlawfully employs 30 foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn by which the defendant would engage in job-seeking activities. In light of the unfavorable circumstances such as the number of foreigners who illegally employed is less than 30 persons, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth. The defendant reflects his fault in depth. The defendant shall be sentenced to punishment as ordered in consideration of favorable circumstances such as having no capacity of punishment, except once a fine, and

arrow