logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.05 2018나2026053
정산금 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases.

Part 3 of the first instance judgment, "No. 4, 2005" in Part 2 shall be applied to " November 4, 2015".

The "real estate of this case" in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to the "real estate of this case".

If the first instance judgment Nos. 5 to 5 of the first instance judgment, the phrase “for the Defendant is insufficient to recognize the grounds for the Defendant’s assertion, as well as the evidence submitted by the Defendant is insufficient to recognize the grounds for the Defendant’s assertion, and even if it is recognized, the grounds alleged by the Defendant alone are insufficient to deem the matters of the instant special agreement null and void.”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow