1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

The court's explanation about this case is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the part concerning which appeal is made under Paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(A) The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff during the appeal are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court are examined, the first instance court’s decision rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). The third instance court’s decision is followed as follows: “C. The president of C.C., on April 1, 2014 (hereinafter “the teachers’ disciplinary committee”), shall read the “the Intervenor’s teachers’ disciplinary committee” as “the teachers’ disciplinary committee” as “the teachers’ disciplinary committee” as “the teachers’ disciplinary committee” as “the teachers’ disciplinary committee,” as set forth in the third instance judgment as set forth in the third instance judgment as set forth in the 15th sentence.

Article 15(3) of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of B Incorporated National University (hereinafter “Cact”) and Article 55 of the former Private School Act (amended by Act No. 13938, Feb. 3, 2016; hereinafter “former Private School Act”) shall be used as the “Cact” in the first instance judgment No. 15. 6 of the first instance judgment, “The Act on the Establishment and Operation of B Incorporated National University (hereinafter “Cact”)” shall be used as the “Cact”, and the third and seventh and seventh and seventh and the third and seventh acts in the 8th and seventh acts shall be incorporated as the “former Private School Act (amended by Act No. 13938, Feb. 3, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply)”.

The part of the 6th judgment of the first instance court, the 3th to 5th judgment, shall be completed as follows:

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Gap evidence 9 (including branch numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1 to 4, 7, 17 to 19.