A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

70,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. The Defendant shall administer philophones,

A. On May 12, 2012, around 23:00, in the manner of inserting approximately 0.03 g of psychotropic drugs in a single-use injection machine and dilution with raw water at the office of the third secretary-general of the operation of the Defendant of Geum-gu, Busan (hereinafter referred to as the “suphone”).

B. At around 01:30 on May 13, 2012, around 01:0, approximately 0.03 g of philophones were administered respectively in the aforementioned manner at the 205 room in Suwon-gu, Busan.

2. The Defendant shall deliver philophones;

(a) around 01:30 on May 13, 2012, approximately 0.03 gopon at the above Fel 205 room:

(b) approximately 03:00 Handphonephones issued approximately 0.11g to G at the above FMoel 205 room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. The written statements of each G in the protocol of interrogation of the accused by the prosecutor's office (the first, the second, and the second) and the protocol of interrogation of the prosecution concerning G;

1. Copy of seizure records;

1. A copy of the investigation report (to analyze and report the details of currency);

1. Requests for appraisal;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a record recording (the contents of conversations between the defendant and H);

1. Article 60 (1) 3, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 4 (b) of Article 2 of the former Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (amended by Act No. 10786, Jun. 7, 201; hereinafter the same shall apply) concerning facts constituting an offense, the relevant provision of the relevant Act and the selection of a punishment, and Articles 60 (1) 3, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparag. 4

1. From among concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (limited to concurrent crimes resulting from the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (compacting) due to the issuance of phiphones around 03:0 on May 13, 2012, which is the largest offense and criminal administration);

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the former Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant did not administer philophones at the telecom as indicated in the judgment at around 01:30 on May 13, 2012.

2. The above evidence is considered as a whole.