logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.14 2017나2074055
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the judgment of the plaintiffs as to the assertion emphasized or new in the trial of the court of first instance, and thus, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420

In the part of the judgment of the first instance court, "the result of the examination of each medical record entrusted to the Han River Medical Center of this court, the Han River Medical Center of the first instance court, the Handong Medical Center of the Korea University Hospital of the Korea University, and the Seoul Medical Center" was "the result of the examination of each medical record entrusted to the head of the first instance court, the head of the Korea University Cancer Hospital of the Korea University, and the head of the Seoul Medical Center," and "the result of the examination of the Seoul Medical Center of the first instance" was "the result of the examination entrusted to the Seoul Medical Center of the first instance court, the result of the examination of the examination of the Seoul Medical Center of the first instance to the head of the Seoul Medical Center of the Seoul Medical Center of the first instance, the result of the examination of the examination of the results of the examination of the examination of the Seoul Medical Center of the first instance to the Seoul Medical Center of the first instance, the result of the examination of the examination of the results of the examination of the examination of the Seoul Medical Center of the first instance to the Seoul Medical Center of the first instance."

2. Judgment on the plaintiffs' assertion

A. The Plaintiffs asserted that, even if the deceased’s trobin value falls within the scope of reference, the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital should have conducted an additional inspection to doubt the deceased’s acute heart background and to detect acute heart background, such as cardio-spath and spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spath

arrow