logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.15 2018나15900
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following contents, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. On the 3th judgment of the first instance court, the following facts are asserted: “The Defendant was a minor accident; the first inquiry of the Seoul Medical Center at the first instance court at the first instance court on April 25, 2017, did not recognize that the Plaintiff interfered with the accident; and the Plaintiff’s aftermath of the accident is doubtful due to other accidents; thus, it cannot be recognized as a disability due to the Plaintiff’s instant accident. However, according to the results of the physical diagnosis of the Seoul Medical Center at the first instance court and the fact inquiry of the first instance court at the Seoul Medical Center at the first instance court, the first instance court’s first instance court’s judgment added the entirety purport of the arguments to the Defendant, i.e.,,, the first inquiry of the first instance court’s Seoul Medical Center at the second instance court’s first instance court’s first instance judgment at the time of the accident at the second instance court’s second instance judgment and the second instance court’s second instance judgment at the time of the accident at the first instance court’s second instance judgment and second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment.

arrow