(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.24 2017누55628

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.24 2017누55628

유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the part added or added below, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

At the bottom of the 6th judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added:

From 2010 to 2014, the deceased showed a high normal blood pressure (137/77m Hgm), high level rain, and middle degree as a result of the comprehensive examination. However, as a result of the cardio-cerebral relationship, the deceased did not seem to have a compromise on high blood pressure, urology, abnormal geological blood transfusion, or scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopher.

In addition, even the data on health insurance for the ten-year period prior to the disaster of this case are not verified by high blood pressure or cardio-cerebral relationship.

The 7th 10th 10th son of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to the court of first instance.

At the bottom of the 7th judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added:

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 2, 8, 11, 13 through 16, 18, 24, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3 (including a serial number if any), and the fact-finding with respect to the Korea Land and Housing Corporation of the court of first instance, as a result of the fact-finding with respect to the Seoul Medical Center of the court of first instance, the court of first instance commissioned the Seoul Medical Center of the court of first instance to conduct a medical record appraisal with respect to the director of Seoul Medical Center of the court of first instance, the entire purport of the argument is as follows: "No.e., the defendant added "the time of the deceased's work does not fall short of the criteria for chronic fault (average average of 64 hours per week during four weeks prior to the outbreak of illness, and average of

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

-행정소송법 제8조 제2항

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2018.03.27 2017누88062

-서울행정법원 2018.02.08 2017구단53654

-부산고등법원 2016.02.03 2015누21056

-부산고등법원 2015.12.02 2015누158

-서울고등법원 2017.07.25 2016누71609