The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the punishment imposed by the lower court on Defendant C, 1 year of imprisonment, 1 to 8, 17,733,00, 17,733,000, 1 year of imprisonment, Defendant D’s imprisonment, 6 months of imprisonment, Defendant B’s fine 5,00,000) is too unreasonable.

2. In the judgment of the Defendants, the Defendants recognized the instant crime and reflected it, and the Defendants did not have the same criminal record, etc. are favorable to the sentencing.

However, in full view of the motive, background, means and result of the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, and other records and arguments, even in light of the favorable circumstances as seen earlier, the punishment imposed by the lower court against the Defendants cannot be too unfair to the extent that it can not escape from destruction because it is too much unreasonable, even if it is considered that the Defendants’ punishment imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

The Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal by the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.