Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual owner of D Gameland in the Gangnam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C and the second floor, and Defendant B is an employee of the above game site.

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, between November 24, 2017 and March 17, 2018, the Defendants established 20 U.S. (20) in the said D Gameland, 20 U.S. (C. 20), 220 U.S. W. 20, and 30 U.S. (P. 20) in the said D Gameland, and allowed many unspecified customers to play a game, and exchanged points in cash after deducting 20% from the points which are the result of the game.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning facts constituting a crime: The Defendants shall be subject to imprisonment under Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; and each choice of imprisonment;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act and Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

1. Defendant A: Reasons for the sentencing of Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act [the scope of recommending punishment] [the grounds for the sentencing of Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry [the scope of recommending punishment] There is no person [the person who is subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and six months) (the business of arranging exchange, arranging exchange, and re-purchase). The decision of sentencing [the person who is subject to special sentencing] The illegal business such as the crime of this case is detrimental to the people's sound labor awareness, and there is a need for strict punishment as it is not eradicated despite continuous control

However, the defendants did not have the same criminal record, and the defendants divided their errors, etc. shall be considered as favorable circumstances to the defendants, and the period and period of the operation of the game room.