All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

Defendant B of the public prosecution room and the victim D (n, 53 years old) are persons in a de facto marital relationship, and Defendant A is those children of Defendant B who have not been able to be in a de facto marital relationship with the victim.

1. On April 6, 2016, Defendant A: (a) discovered and resisted the Defendant that the victim, who returned to the Defendant’s house in Daegu in front of the building of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the head of the Defendant’s house, was able to find out that the Defendant was fluent and accumulated a child outside of the house; and (b) stated that “I am hyp for the head of the e-mail to hyp without any reason, and there was a hyp?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?, the Defendant her body was

2. On April 2, 2016, Defendant B assaulted the victim by making use of brooms and yeast brooms and yeasts, which had been located at the victim’s house, without any particular reason, from No. 105 of the above building E, which is the defendant’s house at the time and time.

The facts charged in this case against the Defendants dismissed are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. Since an agreement entered into between the Defendants and the victim was submitted on October 13, 2016 after the institution of the instant prosecution, and the victim expressed his/her intent not to be punished by the Defendants, all of the instant indictment against the Defendants pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.