A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the facts charged is acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 201, the Defendant: (a) entered Korea as a short-term visa (C-3-2) in the vicinity of the Ansan Station located in the 377-1, Masan-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si; and (b) obtained C’s passport and Chinese identification card in tin, namely, a false statement that “I would create a five-year visa without departure.”

However, facts can not be legally extended the period of stay for foreigners who enter the Republic of Korea under the short-term visa (C-3-2).

On September 28, 201, the Defendant received KRW 4 million from C’s wife D to the Defendant’s Gwangju Bank account (E) around September 11, 201, and continued to receive KRW 300,000 from the victim G of C on May 20, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 300,000 from the victim, namely, a cash from the victim, i.e., the Defendant received KRW 30,000 from the victim G of C without having the above C’s passport and Chinese identification card in a mutual influence restaurant located in the same Dong and Dong around May 20, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant was given a total of 4.3 million won by deceiving the victims.

2. The Defendant forged a private document to forge the documents, such as a visa visa recognition number, which is necessary for visa visa issuance, with a visa bromoer and a medical tourism visa visa issuance.

Defendant from January 2012, 201 to the same year.

3. In order to revise the issuance date of a certificate of employment without authority in the name of the company, such as the company name, name, I, date of birth, J., signature, K, and date of issuance, etc. using a computer for the purpose of exercising a certificate of employment at the Haman Sck-si (hereinafter referred to as the “Hamsan-si”) and to revise the issuance date of the certificate of employment, etc., the certificate of employment in the Korean language was drawn up and printed out, and the above company’s name was inscribed in advance on the next day of the issuance date.

As a result, the Defendant forged a certificate of employment in the name of H Corporation, which is a private document concerning fact-finding, in collusion with the said visaer for the purpose of exercising it.