Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

Defendant

C The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, from July 2014 to December 3 of the same year, from around July 2014 to around December 3, 2012, in operating a game room in the name of “E”, “E”, “E” each of the two weeks and night hours, and purchased free gifts, to communicate with a money exchanger to enable customers to exchange the said free gifts, and Defendant B, from November 23, 2014 to December 3 of the same year, performs the role of managing the funds and employees of the game room on the condition that customers receive KRW 80,000 per day from November 19, 2014 to December 3 of the same year; Defendant C, on the condition that customers receive KRW 70,00 per day from November 19, 2014 to December 3 of the same year, takes charge of providing drinking water, etc. or giving free gifts in the game machine.

Accordingly, the Defendants provided a large number of unspecified customers with an external storage device (USB) where the “sea-to-face” game program was installed, which was not classified by the Game Management Committee, at the same time, at the same time and place as above (five times after September 26, 2014), 40 game machine in the Blue game machine, and 20 game machine in the Clue game machine, etc., and provided them for the use of the outside storage device (USB) where the game program was installed, and the number of customers obtained automatically by having them obtain points according to a contingency result by inserting KRW 10,00 won in the game machine, and 20,000 won are released from the game machine, and the “as there has been a selective distribution,” the Defendants could receive 10% limit per 10,500 won per fee from the name-to-face currency exchange in front of the game room pursuant to the new subparagraph.

As a result, the Defendants provided game products not classified by the Game Rating Board to the public for use, and conducted speculative acts by using speculative electronic gaming machines in collusion with the poor names, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1.F.