logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.07.15 2014고정129
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반방조
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 5, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year on August 13, 2013 by imprisonment with prison labor for violating the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. at the Cheongju District Court.

The defendant is a person who worked for an employee in a game room without a trade name operated by the winners of the names in Pyeongtaek-si B.

On November 13, 2012, the above name-freeist provided 50 scambling game machines and 20 scambling game machines and 50 scambling game machines and 20 scambling game machines, which encourage speculation by not being rated, to many unspecified customers, and provided them with a "sea-free game machine" game, and had customers gain high points according to the scambling of cash in the above game machine and make customers gain 4,500 won excluding 10% of fee per gift certificate acquired by customers in cash.

On November 13, 2012, the Defendant, along with C, D, and E, received KRW 80,00 won per day from the above business owner in the above game site, and the customers wishing to exchange the gift certificates, had them in the Kabter, performed the work of exchange, cleaning and hearting in the Kabter, and the F was also paid KRW 80,00 per day, and the Defendant, C, D, and E performed the work of exchanging the gift certificates with the gift certificates acquired by customers at the Kabter.

As a result, the defendant provided game products ‘marine ' which is different from the contents of the rating classification received by the above-mentioned persons,' and assisted customers by facilitating exchange of game results obtained among the games.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of C, D, E, or F;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Responses with the results of appraisal;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Investigation report (the results of trials in the same kind of the accused), application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the agreement of cases;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow