A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 20, 2012, the Defendant, at around 10:30, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts, stating that “A” was a member of the Korean Hunting Joint Organization, F, G, and H, a member of the Korean Hunting Joint Organization (F, G, and H), who is a member of the Korean Hunting Joint Organization (F, G, and H, a member of the Korean Hunting Joint Organization), had no fact of operating the gun and selling the gun.”

2. On November 7, 2012, the Defendant posted a notice stating that “Around November 7, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection (Defamation) purposeed to slander the victim D,” the Internet “I”, and “J” did not sell the victim by altering the anesthesia gun while operating the gun, etc., but, in the absence of such fact, the Defendant illegally remodeled the previous anesthesia gun, etc. while operating the gun, and caused snow tanks to the shots at the night.”

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by pointing out false facts through information and communications networks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each police statement related to G and H;

1. Application of statutes on each bulletin board (11 pages, 26 pages), respectively;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act (the point of defamation for false facts, the selection of fines), and Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (the point of defamation and the

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel in determining the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to the provisional payment order, and the defendant make the same remarks as the facts of crime and write down