logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.05.31 2015고단1894
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 1894]

1. On November 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s main store business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as intending to take a large brue and escape from illness, on the ground that the Defendant did not drink alcohol; and (b) obstructed the victim’s main store business by force.

2. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and was arrested on a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with business by G circumstances belonging to the police station F District of the police station during the period of their dispatch after receiving a report of 112.

The Defendant, while boarding the patrol vehicle and moving to the earth while drunk, she saw the breath of the breath, and she expressed the breath of the said G as her math frist frist fristm, and assaulted the right-hand part of the said G by her head at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

[2016 Highest 420] On March 26, 2016, the Defendant was urged to settle the fare and return home from L, which is the police officer belonging to the K police of the police station, within the limit of one hundred and sixty days after receiving the 112 report.

The Defendant refused to do so and was under the influence of alcohol, and assaulted a policeman M and L’s chest with his finger hand, and the Defendant intending to get on the said taxi again, she saw the Defendant to take a bath, and assaulted the Defendant’s above behavior with his cell phone image by taking the left hand hand hand of M, which takes the above behavior of the Defendant into a cell phone image.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted police officers as above, thereby obstructing police officers from performing their legitimate duties on handling of reported cases and maintaining order.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 1894]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Written Statements [2016 order 420] 1.

arrow