Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Of the facts charged in this case, the part of the 2017 Highest 242 and 2017 Highest 584 case.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 3424"

1. On September 24, 2016, around 00:35, the Defendant reported to the Defendant at D main points located in Suwon-gu, Busan, the president of the main office of the Defendant, on the charge of paying the city expenses. On September 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported to the Defendant; (b) was about to verify that the slope F belonging to the Busan Southern Police Station E District of the Busan Police Station, who was called upon upon receiving the report, was resolved to the main office manager; (c) was spited twice on the face of the police officer, who was spited in front of the patrol vehicle; and (d) was spited twice in front of the patrol vehicle; and (b) the Defendant assaulted the police officer and interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of order of the police officer.

2. Around September 14:00 on September 25, 2016, the Defendant was unable to avoid a small amount of one-hour disturbance on the grounds that the Defendant did not refund the Defendant’s mobile phone fees in front of the SK mobile phone agent operated by the victim H located in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, for the reason that the Defendant did not refund the Defendant’s mobile phone fees. The Defendant was unable to avoid a large amount of disturbance for about one-hour noise due to the Plaintiff’s lids, apologys, walletss, and cell phoness over several hundreds.

At around 15:30 on the same day, the Defendant got a police officer from gathering goods from the J, a police officer belonging to the Busan Police Station I District of the Busan Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report that the Defendant frighted the fright as above, and had the Defendant prevented him from gathering goods. “Cresh the face of the above police officer on one occasion due to a wall, which was frightened by the frighter, and frighted by his hand, and the face of the police officer on one occasion.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the agency business of the victim H by force, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order by assaulting the above police officer.

3. On September 29, 2016, the Defendant shall not refund a mobile phone fee to an agency located in the mobile phone store specified in the foregoing paragraph 2. The mobile phone fee shall not be refunded.