The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In order to prevent the victim from opening the door of a public warehouse, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged by misunderstanding the facts and misunderstanding the facts. The judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts.

B. The lower court convicted the Defendant of mistake or misapprehension of legal doctrine, even though the Defendant’s act of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles constitutes self-defense or legitimate act, and thus, dismissed illegality.

2. The judgment of the court below that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victim suffered losses from the investigative agency to the court below by consistently preventing the defendant from opening the warehouse. The defendant stated to the effect that he was aware of the victim's right hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand, and the defendant did not want to handle the case immediately after the occurrence of the case. On the contrary, the defendant went away from the investigation agency, and the investigative agency rejected the request for questioning by hand hand hand hand hand hand, and the victim was pushed the defendant. The defendant tried not to go beyond the warehouse, and the defendant's hand was in contact with the victim's hand, but the statement in the statement of grounds for appeal was made only by continuously keeping the victim's hand, and the defendant's hand was stated as one of the victim's knife, and the defendant did not have any explanation as to the victim's hand hand hand hand hand over, and thus, the defendant's credibility is sufficiently explained.