The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the circumstances are favorable to the Defendant, such as: (a) the confession of the instant crime and reflects his mistake when the Defendant was in a trial; (b) the benefits derived from the instant crime do not seem to be large; (c) the promise of regular donation activities in the future, etc.; and (d) there are no criminal records of the same kind.

However, in full view of all other circumstances, such as the fact that the crime related to the illegal game room is highly harmful to society, such as encouraging a speculative spirit of the people and hindering a sound sense of work, and that there is a need to strictly punish because it is not eradicated despite continuous control, and that even to prevent the proliferation of the illegal game room, the business owner operating the illegal game room is in need of a simple and severe punishment, the size of the game room operated by the defendant is considerable, the defendant has been installed and operated in order to avoid control, and continuously operated the illegal game room even after the control, and the nature of the crime is poor, such as continuing to operate the illegal game room, etc., the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the defendant's argument that the sentence imposed by the court below is unreasonable is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.