The judgment below

The part against the Defendants is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and Defendant B for eight months.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment of one year of imprisonment with prison labor sentenced to Defendant A and eight months of imprisonment with prison labor sentenced to Defendant B is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is more poor in that the Defendants conspired to commit a speculative act by using 50 game machines, which are speculative electronic gaming machines, and in light of the number of game machines and the size of business places, etc., the liability for the crime is not less exceptionally applied. In particular, the Defendants have a so-called “rogate” which considers the network by soliciting many other employees, with the entrance door opened in front of the entrance and opened the door door door door, and opened the door door door, and made the Defendants enter the door with only the customers with the verified identity, and there is no need to punish the Defendants as well as those who already committed the crime of this case without the need to punish the Defendants as well as those who already committed the crime of this case.

However, it seems that the defendants were detained for about 100 days during the period and they were in depth to reflect on their depth. Defendant A has no record of criminal punishment other than a fine once, and there is no record of punishment for the same crime, and Defendant B is subject to criminal punishment after 2010.