Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence (one and half years of imprisonment, and confiscation) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake; (b) the Defendant appears to have been given an opportunity to satisfy and satisfying the punishment’s strictness through confinement life for more than six months; (c) the Defendant’s economic condition is not good; and (d) the Defendant has no previous conviction; and (e) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment for a long time after having been sentenced to criminal punishment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in around 197.
However, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the crime related to the illegal game room is likely to cause serious social harm and harm, such as encouraging a citizens' excessive gambling spirit and hindering sound labor practices; (b) there is a need for strict punishment; (c) the business owner operating the illegal game room and the person who facilitates it to prevent the proliferation of the illegal game room; (d) the defendant directly operated the Daejeon Dong-gu C and the E-Game; and (e) the defendant committed the crime repeatedly even after the restriction on two occasions; and (e) the defendant committed the crime repeatedly even after the restriction on two occasions; (c) the game period installed in each game of this case reaches 90,100; (d) the size of the place of business was significant; and (e) the degree of the crime, such as monitoring access through CCTV, is not good in view of other factors such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.