Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2014, at around 19:05, the Defendant, while driving a cargo vehicle in Cribea and driving the road in front of the “Ecafeteria” in Cribea, from the shooting distance room of the KAL hotel at the city of Jeju, the Defendant died of the victim’s net brain in the “EAL hospital” on September 202, 2014, when he was negligent in performing his duty of care to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system and to ensure safe operation by accurately manipulating the steering direction and operating the steering system. In so doing, the Defendant, at around 202:0 on September 18, 2014, had the victim’s netF (n, 37 years of age), a crosswalk without signal lights from the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle to the left side, had the victim died of the thalopty from the “Ea patient in the middle-patient hospital.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes notifying the results of the actual traffic accident investigation report, photographs (Evidence List No. 7), death diagnosis report, and traffic accident analysis report;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Punishment: Article 3 (1) and the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and

1. Suspension of execution: The sentence shall be imposed as per the disposition in consideration of all the following circumstances (traffic crime group, general traffic accident, type 2 (traffic accident death, etc.), mitigation area (special mitigation area), April - 10 months) and the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the reasons for sentencing), taking into account the following circumstances. The favorable circumstances are recognized as facts of crime and reflects: agreement with the victims on the fact of crime; the ordinary circumstances that there are no other criminal records other than once a fine is imposed in 197; the degree of violation of the duty of care is very heavy and the degree of violation of the duty of care is not minor (road crossing accident). The circumstances after the crime were committed, and the family relation of the defendant are higher than those of the victim.