logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2014.12.24 2014가단7582
건물명도
Text

1. The plaintiff's action against the defendant A shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim against the Korea Land and Housing Corporation.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant A (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) leased and occupies the real estate indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) from Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) on the following terms:

B. On August 4, 2010, Defendant A transferred the entire claim for the refund of lease deposit (22,109,000 won) under the above lease agreement to the Geumam Saemaul Cooperative, and notified the Defendant Corporation of the assignment of the said claim.

C. On September 13, 2010, the Daejeon District Court issued a collection order (hereinafter “the first collection order”) with respect to KRW 2,662,644, out of the lease deposit claims against Defendant A for the return of the lease deposit against Defendant A’s Defendant Corporation, by red branch of the Daejeon District Court on September 13, 2010, and the seizure and collection order of the said claim was served on Defendant Corporation on September 15, 2010.

한편, 원고는 동양파이넨셜대부 주식회사의 피고 A에 대한 채권을 양수하여, 2014. 7. 28. 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2014타채2242호로 피고 A의 피고 공사에 대한 임대차보증금반환 채권 중 933,636원에 대해 추가로 채권압류 및 추심명령(이하 ‘제2추심명령’이라 한다)을 받았으며, 위 결정은 2014. 7. 31. 피고 공사에 송달되었다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 1 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff received a collection order for KRW 3,596,280 of the lease deposit against the defendant Corporation's claim for the return of the lease deposit against the defendant Corporation, and the above lease contract terminated upon the expiration of the above period. Thus, the plaintiff asserts that he sought payment of the above money to the defendant Corporation, on behalf of the defendant Corporation, in subrogation of the defendant Corporation for the preservation of the above lease deposit claim.

B. (1) Determination (A) a claim against the Defendant Corporation;

arrow